Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Author: ysuu

August undefined, 2024

WebApr 9, 2016 · The management and control of the assessee company was vested in Messrs. Oakley Bowden & Co. (Madras) Ltd., another private limited company … WebJan 12, 2024 · CIT (A) has upheld the disallowance of Rs.77,18,481/-being claim of sustainable development expenses by simply recording the fact that “assessee has not adduced any cogent argument for deleting the sustainable development expenses”, without going into the fact that in the earlier years, sustainable development expenses are being …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS vs MYSORE …

http://lawfaculty.du.ac.in/files/course_material/VI_Term2024/LB-604%20Principles%20of%20Taxation%20Law.pdf WebMar 11, 2011 · Mysore Minerals Ltd. (2) 2001 250 ITR...725 Kar This was a case in respect of mining of granite. The Division Bench held that it would amount to manufacture relying on an earlier judgment in CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1... Deputy Commissioner Of … phil ranch

Beneficial ownership is relevant than legal ownership to claim ...

http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM41/AM41_460.pdf WebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) DAS, SUDHI RANJAN MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) HASAN, GHULAM BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H. Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (Act XI of 1922), s. 4-Profits derived by the assesseeWhether arose or were received in British Indian in the … Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the … phil ranelin infinite expressions

A Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad.

The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite …

WebCIT vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority (2010) 322 ITR 61 (P & H) 14.S. 22 - INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY – BUSINESS INCOME - S. 28 . Rent from premises with fittings. Appointment between business income and income from house property held to be justified. CIT & Anr. vs. Mysore Inter Continental Hotel P. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 116 … WebApr 29, 2011 · Cited By: 1. Coram: 1. ...concluded by a decision of this Court in IT Ref. No. 312 of 1961 in the case of CIT vs. Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd., judgment wherein was...of this Court in IT Ref. No. 166 of 1985 in the case of CIT vs. New India Sugar Mills judgment wherein was delivered on 12th April, 1990...assessee. 5. t shirts motiveWebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are used in the business of running them on hire also. The appellant has only a leasing business and it does not run a business of hiring trucks to the public. t shirts movies

"WebMysore Chromite Ltd . (1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two cases in which the bills were drawn in favour of the assessee's agent at Calcutta, the sales were effected in India. (1) 27 I.T.R. 128. 140 " - Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

ON THE COMPOSITION OF SOME INDIAN CHROMITES*

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYANARAYANA RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. C. S. Rama Rao Saheb, T. T. Viswanatha Ayyar, Advocates. Judgment Text … WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE …

Did you know?

WebMysore Chromite Ltd. (27 ITR 128)(SC), the Supreme court held that the property in the goods passed in London where the bill of lading was handed over to the buyer’s bank … WebNov 3, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 Posted on June 30, 2024 CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Continue reading Posted in LLB III Sem, Special Contracts, Topic 7: Effects of Sale, Uncategorized Leave a comment

WebA Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 695 - Mahalinga Padmanabhan - There would seem to be a conflict between this decision and the one reported in Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Mysore Chromite Ltd., (S) AIR 1955 SC 98. The main point in controversy is whether the paying or negotiating or the … http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr

WebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) 2. Navin Chandra Mafatlal Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City [1954] INSC 107 (1 November 1954) ... Muir Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Suti Mills Mazdoor Union, Kanpur [1954] INSC 110 (19 November 1954) 6. P. Joseph John Vs. … WebJUSTICE VISWANATHA SASTRI Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras - Appellant Versus Mysore Chromite Limited - Respondent Case No : No Decided On : 29 March 1951. …

WebA Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 695 - Mahalinga Padmanabhan - There would seem to be a conflict between this decision and the one …

WebMysore Sugar Co. Ltd., AIR 1967 SC 723 107 110 Business Expenditure –Allowability - Tests of distinctions between Business expenditure and Capital expenditure [section … phil rankin blue mossWebMysore Chromite Limited . DAS, J.— This is an appeal from the judgment pronounced by the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 29th March, 1951 on a consolidated reference … t shirts m\\u0026s menshttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr t shirts mountainhttp://www.in.kpmg.com/taxflashnews/KPMG-Flash-News-Mother-Hospital-Pvt-Ltd-2.pdf t shirts mountain warehouseWebVodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. Assistant CIT, 2010 Tax LR, 618 (Ker) 14. State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. ... CIT V/s Mysore Chromite Ltd.; 1955, 1 SCR 849. 2. Badri Prasad V/s State of M.P.; 1965, 3 SCR 381. 3. ... The Mogu Liner Ltd. Vs. Manipal Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1991 Ker, 183 5. Indian Airlines Vs. phil ranger liv sothebyshttp://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM41/AM41_460.pdf phil range shortWebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are … phil raney