Shockpulse vs trilogy
WebIn their clinical study, Bozzini et al reported faster stone fragmentation in both ureter (220.4 vs 16.1 min, p < 0.05) and kidney (28.7 vs 19.8 min, p < 0.05) with similar energy emitted (9.9 vs 10.7 kJ and 13.5 vs 16.1 kJ, p > 0.05). 23 Basulto-Martínez et al in an in vitro study concluded that Virtual Basket mode enhanced the ablation rate ... WebLarge T, Nottingham C, Brinkman E, Agarwal D, Ferrero A, Sourial M, Stern K, Rivera M, Knudsen B, Humphreys MR, Krambeck A. Multi-Institutional Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Novel Intracorporeal Lithotripters: ShockPulse-SE vs Trilogy Trial. J Endourol. 2024 Sep; 35 (9):1326-1332 Epub 2024 Aug 16
Shockpulse vs trilogy
Did you know?
WebWhen comparing Trilogy to ShockPulse-SE in a multivariate analysis, total operative room time (104.4 ± 48.2 minutes vs 121.1 ± 59.2 minutes p = 0.126), rates of secondary … Web️ Rate of device malfunction using ShockPulse-SE: 34.7% ️ Rate of device malfunction using Trilogy: 1.9% See more data from the recent multi-institutional randomized trial comparing ShockPulse ...
WebRandall’s plaques occur when calcium deposited in the interstitial tissue of the renal papilla. Researchers want to find the link to these plaques and calcium-based kidney stones. Clinical Trial Details Asymptomatic Stones Antibiotics Therapy before Percutaneous Stone Surgery Shockpulse vs Trilogy Struvite Stone Prevention Study Allena WebTrilogy Lithotrite, The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System Summary The purpose of this study is to measure how well two different devices work to break up and remove kidney stones. We are comparing a newer device to an older one to see which one is …
WebWhen comparing TrilogyTM to ShockPulse-SE in a multivariate analysis, total OR time (104.4 ± 48.2 vs 121.1 ± 59.2 min p=0.126), rates of secondary procedures (17.65% vs … WebAdditionally, for harder stones, the Trilogy device outperforms the Shockpulse. Dr. Krambeck concluded by stating for mini PCNL procedures fragmentation devices without extraction function is ideal and the laser is most commonly used. For standard PCNL a combination device is ideal. Presented by: Amy Krambeck, MD, Professor of Urology ...
Web5 Oct 2016 · 14K views 6 years ago The Shockpulse-SE (Stone Eliminator) is the next generation Cyberwand system from Olympus, offering dual action lithotripsy with proprietary technology to …
WebShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System Catalogue No. Description EGSPL-SR Generator (EGSPL-G) Transducer (EGSPL-T) Nose Cone (EGSPL-NC) Wrench (EGSPL-W) Cleaning Stylet – … shelf sittersWeb14 Sep 2024 · When comparing Trilogy to ShockPulse-SE in a multivariate analysis, total operative room time (104.4 ± 48.2 minutes vs 121.1 ± 59.2 minutes p = 0.126), rates of … shelf sitter gnomesWebWe hypothesize that the Trilogy device will increase the stone clearance rate by 25% compared to the Shockpulse-SE device. Participation eligibility Participant eligibility … splay leg chick treatmentWeb11 Apr 2024 · At 2lbs, ShockPulse was faster than Select US (p=0.027), but did not significantly outpace Trilogy nor Select-USP. At either weight, there was no significant … splay moldingWeb1801 Senate Blvd. Suite 220. Indianapolis, IN 46202. Phone+1 317-962-3700. Fax+1 317-962-8800. Is this information wrong? shelf sitter ornamentsWebWe hypothesize that the Trilogy will increase the stone clearance rate by 25% compared to the Shockpulse-SE The purpose of this study is to measure how well two different devices … splay leg chickensWeb28 Aug 2024 · The novel technology in Trilogy has been demonstrated in bench testing to more quickly disintegrate stones compared to other devices. The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System has been FDA cleared fragmentation of urinary tract … shelf sitting bee gnomes